Show
by
  • 🫣

    Andrew, Stuart and 2 others
    1 Comment
  • Just finished the course. I was already around 1450 going into the course, but I think it was well worth it. My biggest eye opener was how much time and emphasis should be spend on the blunder check aspect of the game. As suggested in the last module I took a look at my last 20 losses and here is what I found out: 11/20 losses were due to a…

    Read more

    Love
    Andrew, Stuart and 3 others
    0 Comments
  • Hey Nelson, I’m still early in the course (module 2) and I love it. My peak rapid rating is 1489 and now I’m 1435 having dropped below 1400 multiple times over the past few weeks/months. What I struggle the most is that once in a while I play a perfect game, steady, growing my advantage from the start, estimated rating by chess dot com of 2200…

    Read more

    Daniel O, Zachary P and 2 others
    3 Comments
    • This is me…

      I’ll play a game or two on bullet at 89-91% accuracy, estimated rating between 1600-1900, then will have 2-3 in a row with inexplicable errors through the entire game.

      Happens less in blitz and rapid for me, but time pressure makes me do bad things.

      Also, I tend to compound my mistakes. Once I make one, I get annoyed and struggle to…

      Read more

      • View 1 reply
    • Yeah Kamil, that’s one of the main things that separates the really strong GM’s from everyone else. They are able to play the best moves consistently game after game. What I have found is that the type of opening sometimes affects my accuracy. It’s easier to play good games in opening/middlegame positions you’re familiar with as opposed…

      Read more