
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Chess Vibes | Quan G | Activity</title>
	<link>https://chessvibes.net/members/47eb7154/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://chessvibes.net/members/47eb7154/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Quan G.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 22:13:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbf1f064452c5f3f4f83cede12e8e4ad</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/2305/#acomment-2385</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:49:03 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nelson,<br />
Great course!  The lessons are well organized and I can immediately find which thing I need to work on the most.<br />
One question though is that I sometimes still miss a kind of “counterthreat” tactic: instead of dealing with a threat (e.g. an attack on a piece), we instead create an equal or even bigger threat for the opponent, so that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2385"><a href="https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/2305/#acomment-2385" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://chessvibes.net/members/a4186d32/" data-bb-hp-profile="15" rel="nofollow">Nelson</a> posted an update <p>Hey guys! Post questions for the first group coaching call (<span>Tuesday, August 6th at 8pm EST) here!<b> Please check first if someone has already asked a similar question and just like/heart [&hellip;]</b></span></p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">44f62ad812984a6b953cd3fa60e038da</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: One nice thing about Section 4 is I can immediately [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/2224/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:03:34 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One nice thing about Section 4 is I can immediately figure out what is my weakest tactics.  So far I have completed up to 4.10 and I actually worked out *all* the puzzles (even the master ones) except forks (which I screw up even the intermediate ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a82a0582ca4be9d2891ef50ac9a4dda</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: In 4.2 there is a pattern where a queen defends a [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/2038/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:45:07 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 4.2 there is a pattern where a queen defends a rook *through* the opponent’s king, delivering a checkmate.  If I remember correctly, this is called an X-ray defense.  But there are also more sophisticated patterns (like on Wikipedia which I could not get the idea).  Maybe Nelson could talk about X-ray defenses or attacks in some separate video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be2c26b8fc89fdbdfea9350c45ab6e85</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: Went through 3.5 and 3.6.  I just noticed that Owen’s [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/1824/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 07:16:08 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went through 3.5 and 3.6.  I just noticed that Owen’s defense, Nimzo-Indian and French defense have very common ideas: white has pawns in d4 and e4, and knight on c3, while black has pawns in e6 and d5 and bishop on b4 pinning the knight.  So I guess the same principle applies to all of them: c-pawns are important to open things up, black needs&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1824"><a href="https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/1824/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e0f45e034ce21ca3d0dee6fccbc830f</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/1146/#acomment-1148</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:53:03 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I’m pretty sure that chess.com will suddenly have lots of stonewall and Owen players.  So maybe one wants to study how to counter them as well 🙂</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://chessvibes.net/members/47eb7154/" data-bb-hp-profile="304" rel="nofollow">Quan G</a> posted an update <p>Just went through 3.3.  I know that other than Owen’s defense (…b6 and …Bb7), there’s also Modern defense (…g6 …Bg7), which I guess has the same idea except that we fight for dark squares instead?</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8154b9e33142ae55fa4516e03f713831</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: Just went through 3.3.  I know that other than Owen’s [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/1146/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:46:55 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just went through 3.3.  I know that other than Owen’s defense (…b6 and …Bb7), there’s also Modern defense (…g6 …Bg7), which I guess has the same idea except that we fight for dark squares instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af70a2d17c1334ea277e71d97a89c55b</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: Moving on to the Stonewall setup in Module 2.  One thing [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/1028/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:03:06 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving on to the Stonewall setup in Module 2.  One thing to note is against the accelerated queen’s indian setup:</p>
<p>d4 Nf6 e3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 which attacks g2 pawn.</p>
<p>Then you cannot play f4.  Still, you can play Nf3 to block and transpose into a Colle system.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">21d87b4abf071c5761382f90d9af79e6</guid>
				<title>Quan G posted an update: I just started the course and went through Module 1.  [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://chessvibes.net/news-feed/p/608/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 06:56:28 -0600</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started the course and went through Module 1.  The story in 1.6 really makes sense.  Even a high-rated player can lose, and even losing to a low-rated player is not a big deal because that’s how games work.  What I should do is to learn from the mistakes and improve, and nothing else.</p>
<p>P.S. I wonder how David and Robert are doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		